Blog
Kubernetes
Engineering
5
minutes

Crossplane loves Kubernetes as much as we do... But, differently!

Kubernetes has emerged as the de facto orchestrator for deploying and managing containerized applications. Its versatility and robust ecosystem have paved the way for innovative tools that leverage its capabilities, extending its utility beyond mere container orchestration. Among these tools, Crossplane and Qovery stand out for their unique approaches to simplifying cloud resource management. While they serve different purposes, both share a common foundation in utilizing Kubernetes as an orchestration layer, underscoring a shared belief in Kubernetes' ability to manage all types of workloads, including external ones.
Romaric Philogène
CEO & Co-founder
Summary
Twitter icon
linkedin icon

Understanding Qovery and Crossplane

Qovery's control plane runs outside of Kubernetes - but a Qovery agent system runs on Kubernetes

Qovery is an Internal Developer Platform (IDP) that abstracts Kubernetes complexity, enabling developers to deploy applications seamlessly with just a few clicks. Qovery focuses on enhancing the developer experience by providing a simplified interface for managing the entire application lifecycle, from deployment to scaling and monitoring, without requiring deep Kubernetes expertise. It embodies the philosophy that every developer can be autonomous, promoting efficiency within teams.

Crossplane with components (CRDs) installed on Kubernetes

Crossplane, on the other hand, is an open-source Kubernetes add-on that extends Kubernetes' capabilities to manage and provision cloud resources across multiple providers. It allows developers to define their cloud services using Kubernetes-style APIs, fostering a uniform workflow for deploying both on-cluster and off-cluster resources. Crossplane transforms Kubernetes into a universal control plane, bridging the gap between containerized workloads and external cloud services.

Kubernetes as a Common Ground

Both Qovery and Crossplane recognize Kubernetes as a powerful platform for managing diverse workloads. This shared perspective underlines a broader trend in the cloud-native ecosystem: the extension of Kubernetes beyond its original scope to encompass a wide range of infrastructure management tasks.

Qovery and Crossplane are both built to manage inner and external resources at Kubernetes

By building on Kubernetes, both platforms leverage its scalability, resilience, and extensibility to offer solutions that align with the principles of cloud-native development.

Qovery: Simplifying the Developer Experience on Kubernetes

Qovery stands out for its commitment to simplifying the Kubernetes experience for developers. It abstracts the complexity of Kubernetes, providing the self-service experience that developers expect from their platform engineering team. By integrating seamlessly into existing workflows and supporting a wide array of technologies (including major databases like Postgres), Qovery facilitates a smooth path to production, embodying the ethos of "develop first, worry about infrastructure later."

Crossplane: Unifying Cloud Resource Management

Crossplane extends Kubernetes' reach into the realm of cloud resource management, enabling developers to manage external resources with the same APIs used for on-cluster resources. This approach not only streamlines the deployment process but also introduces a level of uniformity and portability across different cloud providers. Crossplane's model empowers teams to define their infrastructure as code, ensuring consistency, reproducibility, and automation in cloud resource provisioning.

Certainly, let's integrate this crucial distinction into our exploration of how Qovery and Crossplane each harness Kubernetes to serve the cloud-native community.

Divergent Paths: API Extension vs. Vanilla API Consumption

One of the fundamental differences between Crossplane and Qovery lies in their approach to extending Kubernetes' capabilities. Crossplane broadens the scope of Kubernetes by introducing Custom Resource Definitions (CRDs) to extend the Kubernetes API. This approach effectively turns Kubernetes into a control plane for managing external resources, allowing developers to use Kubernetes-style manifests to provision and manage cloud services as if they were native Kubernetes objects. Crossplane's use of CRDs encapsulates a deep integration with Kubernetes, leveraging it not just as an orchestrator but also as a universal control plane for cloud resources.

Crossplane uses Kubernetes as a Control Plane and Orchestrator - to use Crossplane you're better being familiar with Kubernetes.

Qovery, in contrast, opts for a different approach by consuming the vanilla Kubernetes API without extending it through CRDs. Instead of embedding control plane functionalities directly into Kubernetes, Qovery uses Kubernetes purely as an orchestrator. The control plane responsibilities—such as user interface interactions, API management, and integration with other tools—are handled by Qovery's own control plane. This architecture allows Qovery to provide extended interfaces like a Web Interface, API, CLI, and a Terraform Provider. These interfaces offer Platform Engineering teams a rich set of tools to build upon, enabling a more tailored and simplified experience for managing deployments and infrastructure.

The Qovery Control Plane expose fluent interfaces ideal for Platfform Engineering and Developers to use and extend the experience. The Qovery Engine translates actions into Kubernetes API calls

This distinction highlights a philosophical and architectural divergence in leveraging Kubernetes. Crossplane's approach aligns with the idea of Kubernetes as a universal layer for cloud-native operations, expanding its reach to include external resource management. Qovery's strategy, however, focuses on streamlining the developer experience by leveraging Kubernetes' orchestration capabilities while abstracting away the complexity through its own control plane. This ensures that developers and platform engineers can interact with cloud-native technologies through more familiar and accessible interfaces, without needing to delve into the intricacies of Kubernetes itself.

In essence, while Crossplane seeks to universalize the Kubernetes API for a broad spectrum of cloud resources, Qovery aims to democratize Kubernetes' power by making it more accessible to developers and teams. Both approaches offer unique advantages, catering to different needs within the cloud-native ecosystem.

Complementary, Not Competing

The potential to deploy Crossplane with Qovery — thanks to Qovery's native support for any Helm chart, including Crossplane's — highlights an interesting intersection between the two platforms. While deploying Crossplane on Qovery might not be common due to their overlapping functionalities, this capability underscores the flexibility and developer-centric approach of Qovery. It opens up possibilities for teams already using Crossplane to enhance their developer experience through Qovery's streamlined interface.

Conclusion

Qovery and Crossplane exemplify the innovative use of Kubernetes as an orchestration layer for managing a wide range of workloads, both on-cluster and off-cluster. While their purposes differ, their reliance on Kubernetes reflects a shared belief in its capability to act as a universal platform for cloud-native development. This article is not about pitting Qovery against Crossplane; rather, it's about highlighting how both platforms contribute to the Kubernetes ecosystem, each enhancing the cloud-native journey in their unique way. Through their complementary strengths, Qovery and Crossplane offer teams the tools to embrace Kubernetes' full potential, making cloud-native development more accessible, efficient, and scalable.

Resources:

Share on :
Twitter icon
linkedin icon
Tired of fighting your Kubernetes platform?
Qovery provides a unified Kubernetes control plane for cluster provisioning, security, and deployments - giving you an enterprise-grade platform without the DIY overhead.
See it in action

Suggested articles

DevOps
 minutes
10 Best Octopus Deploy Alternatives: Trade Manual Deployment for Full Pipeline Automation

Modernize your pipeline. Explore the top Octopus Deploy alternatives for cloud-native Kubernetes delivery and full GitOps integration.

Mélanie Dallé
Senior Marketing Manager
DevOps
Platform Engineering
Kubernetes
5
 minutes
10 Best Container Management Tools for the Kubernetes Era

Move beyond basic Docker commands. We review the top container management platforms, including Qovery, Rancher, and OpenShift, that tame Kubernetes complexity and streamline your deployment workflows.

Morgan Perry
Co-founder
DevOps
16
 minutes
Enterprise DevOps Automation: Moving from Scripts to Platform Engineering

Stop writing fragile scripts. Discover how top enterprises use Kubernetes Management Platforms to automate governance (Policy-as-Code), scale ephemeral environments, and enforce FinOps with Spot Instances.

Mélanie Dallé
Senior Marketing Manager
DevOps
Kubernetes
 minutes
Top 10 Platform9 Alternatives: Best managed Kubernetes solutions for scale

Need a better way to manage on-prem Kubernetes? Review 10 alternatives to Platform9, categorized by "Infrastructure Ops" (Rancher) vs. "Developer Experience" (Qovery).

Mélanie Dallé
Senior Marketing Manager
DevOps
Kubernetes
 minutes
Top 10 Rafay alternatives for enterprise Kubernetes operations

Is Rafay's complexity slowing you down? Compare the top 10 Rafay alternatives for 2026. From fleet managers like Rancher to developer platforms like Qovery, find the balance between control and velocity.

Mélanie Dallé
Senior Marketing Manager
DevOps
Kubernetes
 minutes
Top 10 Spectro Cloud alternatives for multi-cluster fleet management

Don't just manage clusters. Modernize your stack. Compare Spectro Cloud vs. Qovery vs. Rancher to decide between "Fleet Operations" and "Developer Self-Service.

Mélanie Dallé
Senior Marketing Manager
DevOps
Kubernetes
 minutes
Top 10 VMware alternatives after the Broadcom acquisition

Hit by Broadcom's VMware price hikes? Compare the top 10 alternatives for 2026, from direct replacements like Proxmox and Nutanix to modernization platforms like Qovery.

Mélanie Dallé
Senior Marketing Manager
DevOps
Kubernetes
Platform Engineering
6
 minutes
10 Red Hat OpenShift alternatives to reduce licensing costs

Is OpenShift too expensive? Discover the best alternatives for 2026. Whether you need Developer Self-Service (Qovery) or Hybrid Cluster Ops (Rancher), find the right fit for your team.

Morgan Perry
Co-founder

It’s time to change
the way you manage K8s

Turn Kubernetes into your strategic advantage with Qovery, automating the heavy lifting while you stay in control.