A catalog,
- not a keyring.
Your team is the translation layer between product engineers and a stack of cloud, Kubernetes, Terraform, CI, secrets and DNS. Most of what lands in the queue does not need your expertise - it just needs a safe way to happen without you. Qovery gives you a governed surface you own: developers and their agents get a finite set of approved operations instead of a keyring of credentials.
You define the catalog and the policy. Standard Terraform, Kubernetes and cloud APIs stay authoritative, in your own account. Qovery operates the infrastructure you already run rather than asking you to move it.
A four-person platform team supports roughly 250 product engineers. Three years earlier the same ratio was about 1:30 - the team did not grow to match.
A five-person platform team facing the demand of a much larger engineering organization. They bought the operating model rather than the headcount.
Qovery operates infrastructure in your own cloud account. Control plane and data plane are separated - nothing migrates to a multi-tenant platform.
Alan alone runs about 170 applications across AWS and GCP, and more than 90,000 deployments a year across ten clusters.
You design the operating model. Qovery executes it.
Qovery does not replace the platform team. It gives the team a product surface to own, so the week goes on standards and architecture instead of the ticket queue.
A catalog instead of a keyring
- Developers and agents get a finite set of approved operations, not credentials
- You decide what exists in the catalog and which roles may call each operation
- Adding a safe operation is a platform decision, not a support ticket
- The boundary lives in the API - not in a prompt, a skill file or a deny-list
Policy before execution
- Identity, role, environment and scope are evaluated before anything runs
- A refused call applies nothing, so there is no partial state to clean up
- One policy path for humans, pipelines, portals and agents alike
- Every accepted operation is attributed and has a known reversal path
The escape hatch stays open
- Standard Terraform, Kubernetes and cloud APIs remain authoritative
- Terraform provider, CLI and API for the workflows you already script
- Nothing stops you dropping to kubectl when the abstraction runs out
- Your estate stays standard, so what you would rebuild on leaving is the surface, not the stack
Platform teams that kept control.
"Within a few days, we had something running that replicates our previous setup but with multiple environments, greater control, best practices in place, extensibility, and future-proof capabilities."
"We had one full-time person dedicated to managing Beanstalk, which has completely disappeared. Now, we're able to do more with less."
"Qovery provided an easy-to-use interface that allowed us to efficiently manage our infrastructure within our own AWS account."
"Previously, my SRE team needed to be extremely cautious about changes going to production. Now, we can feel much more confident."
Qovery vs. building it yourself
Building the interface is a fraction of the work. Maintaining it across cloud changes, agent frameworks and audits is the larger cost.
Answered straight.
Will I lose control of my infrastructure?
You gain a control surface. You define the catalog and the policy; Qovery executes only what you approved. Standard Terraform, Kubernetes and cloud APIs stay authoritative, in your own cloud account.
Is this vendor lock-in?
Your infrastructure stays standard and stays yours - Qovery operates on top of it. What you would rebuild on leaving is the governed surface, not the estate underneath it.
We already have Backstage or Crossplane.
Those give you a portal and a resource model. You still build and maintain the operations behind them, and whatever decides if one may run in a given context. That is the part Qovery ships.
Our scripts already automate deployment.
Deployment is the part that is already automated. The week goes on the long tail: stuck environments, drift, permissions, cleanup, one-off requests. Those are what a catalog is for.
Own the operating model, not the ticket queue.
Bring the operations your team repeats every week. We will work out which of them belong in a catalog your developers and their agents can call without you.