Blog
Product
2
minutes

The Future of Qovery - Week #1

During the next ten weeks, our team will work to improve the overall experience of Qovery. We gathered all your feedback (thank you to our wonderful community 🙏), and we decided to make significant changes to make Qovery a better place to deploy and manage your apps.
Romaric Philogène
CEO & Co-founder
Summary
Twitter icon
linkedin icon

This series will reveal all the changes and features you will get in the next major release of Qovery. Let's go!

👋 Farewell .qovery.yml

When we released the first version of Qovery DevOps automation tool in January 2020, we wanted to make app deployment as frictionless as possible for any developer. Meaning, deploying your app is as simple as putting a Dockerfile and files at the root of your project. Configuring your application and its required resources (CPU, memory, database, storage, custom domain) was so simple that thousands of developers are using Qovery today. But the .qovery.yml brought three significant downsides:

Complexity to configure your application

Since we launched our web console, configuring an application has been difficult. You can't do it from the web console. You have to edit the .qovery.yml from your repository, commit, and push your changes to apply them, which is inconsistent and not the experience we want to offer to our users. Removing the .qovery.yml means that app configuration will be possible via the Qovery web console.

In development: this is the new web console to configure CPU, memory and other parameters..

Multiple apps from the same git repository

Because Qovery relies on the .qovery.yml within a git repository, managing multiple times the same repository as different apps are not possible. Removing the .qovery.yml will make deploying multiple times the same repository possible.

Examples:

  • You need to start the same application in a "worker" mode and "API" mode.
  • You need to deploy an app for several customers, but each customer needs its app.

Monorepository support

Last but not least, more than 40% of our users were requesting mono repository support. Removing the .qovery.yml will make mono repository support finally possible.

In development: this is the new web console to associate your git repository and choose your Dockerfile

And I am not mentioning the complexity of keeping the .qovery.yml with our internal state... That's for all those reasons that we decided to get rid of the .qovery.yml file.

In the future, we'll probably support the .qovery.yml for "Infrastructure as Code again", but differently.

Join the community on Discord to give your feedback.

See you next week -- same place :)

Read the following article: The Future of Qovery -- Week #2

Romaric from Qovery -- We are hiring

Share on :
Twitter icon
linkedin icon
Tired of fighting your Kubernetes platform?
Qovery provides a unified Kubernetes control plane for cluster provisioning, security, and deployments - giving you an enterprise-grade platform without the DIY overhead.
See it in action

Suggested articles

Kubernetes
DevOps
Platform Engineering
6
 minutes
Kubernetes vs. Docker: Escaping the complexity trap

Is Kubernetes complexity killing your team’s velocity? Compare Docker vs. Kubernetes in 2026 and discover how to get production-grade orchestration with the "Git Push" simplicity of Docker.

Morgan Perry
Co-founder
Kubernetes
DevOps
Platform Engineering
7
 minutes
Kubernetes vs. OpenShift (and how Qovery simplifies it all)

Stuck between Kubernetes and OpenShift? Discover their pros, cons, differences, and how Qovery delivers automated scaling, simplified deployments, and the best of both worlds.

Morgan Perry
Co-founder
Platform Engineering
DevOps
Kubernetes
9
 minutes
Rancher vs. OpenShift (and why Qovery might be the accelerator)

Comparing Rancher vs. OpenShift for Kubernetes management? Discover their pros, cons, and why Qovery offers a simpler, cost-effective alternative for growing teams.

Morgan Perry
Co-founder
DevOps
Platform Engineering
Kubernetes
8
 minutes
VMware Tanzu vs. Red Hat OpenShift (and why Qovery is the fast track)

Comparing VMware Tanzu vs. Red Hat OpenShift for enterprise Kubernetes? Explore their features, pros, cons, and discover why Qovery is the smarter alternative for rapid application delivery.

Morgan Perry
Co-founder
Kubernetes
6
 minutes
When Kubernetes Becomes the Bottleneck, and How to Fix It

Struggling with Kubernetes configuration sprawl and long deployment queues? Discover how to identify technical vs. workflow bottlenecks and why shifting to a self-service Kubernetes management platform like Qovery is the key to scaling your engineering velocity.

Mélanie Dallé
Senior Marketing Manager
DevOps
Kubernetes
Platform Engineering
6
 minutes
10 Red Hat OpenShift alternatives to reduce licensing costs

Is OpenShift too expensive? Compare the top 10 alternatives for 2026. Discover how to transition to Rancher, standard EKS, or modern K8s management platforms.

Morgan Perry
Co-founder
DevOps
6
 minutes
The enterprise guide to DevOps automation: scaling kubernetes and delivery pipelines

Scale your enterprise DevOps automation without configuration sprawl. Learn how a Kubernetes management platform like Qovery enables secure, self-service infrastructure.

Mélanie Dallé
Senior Marketing Manager
Product
Infrastructure Management
5
 minutes
Migrating from NGINX Ingress to Envoy Gateway (Gateway API): behind the scenes

Following the end of maintenance of the Ingress NGINX project, we have been working behind the scenes to migrate our customers’ clusters from Kubernetes Ingress + NGINX Ingress Controller to Gateway API + Envoy Gateway.

Benjamin Chastanier
Software Engineer

It’s time to change
the way you manage K8s

Turn Kubernetes into your strategic advantage with Qovery, automating the heavy lifting while you stay in control.