Top 10 VMware alternatives after the Broadcom acquisition

Key Points:

• The "Modernization" Move: Qovery. Stop managing VMs entirely. Move apps to containers on your own cloud to cut operational overhead.
• The "Community" Swap: Proxmox. The best free/open-source hypervisor for direct replacement of ESXi.
• The "Enterprise" Swap: Nutanix. The closest 1:1 replacement for vSphere in large corporate data centers.

For decades, VMware vSphere was the gold standard. It allowed IT teams to slice physical servers into manageable Virtual Machines. But the landscape has shifted.

The Broadcom acquisition has introduced steep price hikes, bundled licensing, and uncertainty for the mid-market.

However, simply swapping one hypervisor for another is a "Lateral Move." You are still stuck managing Guest OS patches, heavy VM footprints, and idle capacity.

The most innovative teams are using this disruption to make a "Vertical Move", migrating from VMs to Containers. Below, we rank the top 10 alternatives, categorizing them by "Direct Replacements" (Hypervisors) and "Modern Upgrades" (Platforms).

The Top 10 VMware Alternatives: Hypervisors vs. Modern Platforms

To help you decide whether to "Lift and Shift" or "Refactor and Modernize," we’ve broken down the top alternatives.

1. Qovery – The "Modernization" Alternative

Best For: Teams who want to stop managing Virtual Machines entirely and focus on Applications.

The Strategy: Instead of looking for a cheaper way to run heavy VMs, Qovery allows you to run your applications on efficient Kubernetes clusters in your own cloud (AWS, Azure, GCP). It handles the underlying infrastructure, networking, and scaling automatically.

Pros:

• Zero Guest OS Management: You no longer need to patch Windows/Linux kernels for every single app.
• Cost Efficiency: Containers share the OS kernel, meaning you can fit 3x-5x more applications on the same hardware compared to VMs.
• Developer Velocity: Developers get self-service "Ephemeral Environments" in seconds, which is impossible with heavy VMs.

Cons:

• Requires Containerization: You cannot run a legacy "Pet" VM (e.g., a monolithic Windows 2012 server) on Qovery. You must containerize the app first.
• Not a Hypervisor: It runs on top of cloud infrastructure, not directly on bare metal.

Stop Managing VMs. Start Shipping Code

Don't just swap hypervisors - upgrade your entire workflow. Qovery provisions infrastructure, manages Kubernetes, and deploys apps with zero friction.

See Qovery in Action Get started for free

2. Proxmox VE – The Community Favorite

Best For: Teams that need a direct, 1:1 replacement for ESXi and vCenter without the cost.

The Strategy: Proxmox is an open-source virtualization platform that combines KVM hypervisor and LXC containers. It is widely considered the best "free" alternative to vSphere.

Pros:

• Price: It is free (open source) with optional paid support.
• Features: Built-in backup/restore and high availability (HA) out of the box.

Cons:

• Support: While the community is great, it lacks the 24/7 "Enterprise SLA" ecosystem that VMware offered.
• Networking: The SDN (Software Defined Networking) stack is less mature than NSX.

3. Nutanix AHV – The Enterprise Equal

Best For: Large enterprises that need a "Safe" switch with full support.

The Strategy: Nutanix is the closest direct competitor to VMware. Their Acropolis Hypervisor (AHV) is often bundled with their Hyper-Converged Infrastructure (HCI) software.

Pros:

• Migration: Excellent tools to "Move" vSphere VMs to Nutanix with minimal downtime.
• Management: The "Prism" UI is arguably better and more modern than vCenter.

Cons:

• Cost: It is not a cheap alternative. You are trading one premium vendor for another.
• Lock-in: Often requires specific certified hardware or the full Nutanix software stack.

4. Harvester (SUSE) – The Bridge

Best For: Teams who want to move to Kubernetes but still have legacy VMs they can't delete.

The Strategy: Harvester is built on top of Kubernetes but looks and feels like VMware vCenter. It allows you to run legacy Virtual Machines inside a Kubernetes cluster.

Pros:

• Future Proof: It provides a path to migrate VMs to containers over time.
• Integration: deeply integrated with Rancher for management.

Cons:

• Maturity: It is a newer project compared to the rock-solid stability of ESXi.

5. Red Hat OpenShift Virtualization

Best For: Red Hat customers who need to run VMs alongside containers.

The Strategy: Based on KubeVirt, this feature allows OpenShift to manage standard Virtual Machines. It treats a VM just like a Docker container.

Pros:

• Single Pane: Manage your legacy SQL servers and your modern Microservices in one UI.
• Stability: Backed by Red Hat’s enterprise support.

Cons:

• Complexity: OpenShift is notoriously heavy and difficult to manage (and expensive).
• Cost: You might end up paying similar licensing fees to what you paid VMware.

Read more: Qovery vs. OpenShift

6. XCP-ng – The Xen Alternative

Best For: Fans of XenSource or former Citrix Hypervisor users.

The Strategy: XCP-ng is a community-powered virtualization platform based on the Xen hypervisor (the same engine that powered early AWS).

Pros:

• Stability: Xen is battle-tested at massive scale.
• Open Source: Fully open governance with no vendor lock-in.

Cons:

• Niche: The ecosystem of third-party backup and monitoring tools is smaller than KVM/Proxmox.

7. Microsoft Hyper-V

Best For: Windows-centric shops.

The Strategy: If you are already paying for Windows Server Datacenter edition, you likely already own Hyper-V.

Pros:

• "Free": Included in your existing Microsoft licensing.
• Support: If you run a Microsoft stack (AD, SQL, Exchange), the integration is native.

Cons:

• OS Tax: You still pay for the underlying Windows OS licensing.
• Linux Performance: While improved, it is historically less performant for Linux workloads than KVM/ESXi.

8. Public Cloud (AWS / Azure / GCP)

Best For: Closing the datacenter completely.

The Strategy: "Lift and Shift." You take your VM files and upload them to EC2 or Azure VMs.

Pros:

• Zero Hardware: No more replacing hard drives or managing power supplies.
• Scale: Infinite capacity.

Cons:

• Cost Shock: Running a VM 24/7 in the cloud is significantly more expensive than running it on-premise. (Unless you modernize with Qovery to use Autoscaling).

9. OpenStack

Best For: Telecoms and massive research labs building a "Private Cloud."

The Strategy: OpenStack allows you to build an AWS-like environment on your own hardware.

Pros:

• Control: You own every layer of the stack.
• Standard: The API is the industry standard for private cloud.

Cons:

• Complexity: The joke is "OpenStack is free, if your time is worthless." It requires a dedicated engineering team to maintain.

10. VergeIO

Best For: Mid-market teams wanting a simpler "SAN-less" alternative.

The Strategy: VergeIO collapses the stack (Storage, Compute, Networking) into a single piece of software. It is positioned as a direct "VMware Exit" tool.

Pros:

• Efficiency: extremely lightweight code base compared to the "bloat" of VMware.
• Migration: Built-in tools specifically targeting the VMware exodus.

Cons:

• Market Share: A smaller player compared to Nutanix or Microsoft.

Conclusion: Lift & Shift vs. Modernize

If you are leaving VMware, you have a strategic choice to make:

• To keep running legacy VMs: Choose Proxmox (Budget) or Nutanix (Enterprise).
• To stop managing infrastructure entirely: Choose Qovery.

Don't Pay the "VM Tax" Forever

The Broadcom acquisition is your signal to modernize. Move from static VMs to auto-scaling containers on your own cloud with Qovery.

See Qovery in ActionGet started for free