Qovery Achieves SOC2 Compliance
What is SOC2 Compliance?
Service Organization Control (SOC) 2 is an auditing procedure that validates a service organization's controls for maintaining user data's security, availability, processing integrity, confidentiality, and privacy. It is one of the most sought-after and rigorous compliance standards in the technology industry, providing an independent third-party assessment of an organization's internal controls and procedures.
By achieving SOC2 Type I compliance, Qovery has been independently verified to have the necessary controls and processes to protect our client's data. This milestone is a testament to the robustness of our security practices and our dedication to maintaining the trust of our clients.
What Does This Mean for Our Users and Customers?
As a Qovery user or customer, you can have confidence in the security and reliability of our platform. Our SOC2 Type I compliance demonstrates that we have implemented the necessary safeguards to protect your sensitive data and ensure the availability and integrity of our services. You can trust that Qovery is taking every precaution to secure your information, which is of the utmost importance in today's digital landscape.
What's Next: SOC2 Type II Compliance
While we celebrate our achievement of SOC2 Type I compliance, our journey does not end here. We are already on the road to achieving SOC2 Type II compliance in the coming months. This next level of compliance will involve a more in-depth examination of our controls over a specified period, further cementing our commitment to the highest security standards.
Access Our SOC2 Report
We believe in transparency and want our users to have access to all relevant information about our compliance efforts. You can review our SOC2 Type I report by visiting trust.qovery.com, where you will find detailed information on our controls and processes.
I thank the Qovery team for their hard work and dedication in achieving this significant milestone. We are steadfast in our commitment to upholding the highest security, privacy, and reliability standards. We look forward to continuing to provide our users and customers with a secure and trusted platform.
links:
.svg)
.svg)
.svg)
Suggested articles
The cluster coming up is the easy part. What catches teams off guard is what happens six months later: certificates expire without a single alert, node pools run at 40% over-provisioned because nobody revisited the initial resource requests, and a manual kubectl patch applied during a 2am incident is now permanent state. Agentic control planes enforce declared state continuously. Monitoring tools just report the problem.
The instinct when setting up Kubernetes observability is to instrument everything and send it all to your APM vendor. That works fine at ten nodes. At a hundred, the bill becomes a board-level conversation. The less obvious problem is the fix most teams reach for: aggressive sampling. That is how intermittent failures affecting 1% of requests disappear from your monitoring entirely.
Scaling your deployments to zero is only half the battle. If your cluster autoscaler does not aggressively bin-pack and terminate the underlying worker nodes, you are still paying for idle metal. True environment sleeping requires tight integration between your ingress layer and your node provisioner to actually realize FinOps savings.
The structure, table, tool list, and code blocks are all worth keeping. The main work is fixing AI-isms in the prose, updating the case study to real metrics, correcting the FAQ format, and replacing the CTAs with the proper HTML blocks. The tool descriptions need the "Core strengths / Potential weaknesses" headers made less template-y, and the intro needs a sharper human voice.
For years, Red Hat OpenShift has been the safe choice for heavily regulated, on-premise environments. It operates as a secure fortress. But in the public cloud, that fortress acts as an expensive prison. Paying proprietary per-core licensing fees on top of your standard AWS or GCP compute bill is a redundant "middleware tax." Escaping OpenShift requires decoupling your infrastructure from your developer experience by running standard, vanilla Kubernetes paired with an agentic control plane.
Agentic Kubernetes resource reclamation is the practice of using an autonomous control plane to continuously identify, suspend, and delete idle infrastructure across a multi-cloud Kubernetes fleet. It replaces manual cleanup and reactive autoscaling with intent-based policies that act on business state, eliminating the configuration drift and cloud waste typical of unmanaged fleets.
Kubernetes focuses on container orchestration, but the reality on the ground is far less forgiving. Provisioning a single cluster is a trivial Day-1 exercise. The true operational nightmare begins on Day 2. Teams that treat multi-cloud fleets like isolated pets inevitably face crushing YAML configuration drift, runaway AWS bills, and severe scaling bottlenecks.
.webp)