Blog
DevOps
Cloud
6
minutes

Traditional Managed Services vs. DevOps Automation Platforms: A Comprehensive Comparison

Infrastructure management is critical for companies building and scaling applications. Traditional managed services (MSPs) handle these tasks externally but often come with high costs, slow execution, and limited flexibility. For teams needing control, speed, and efficiency, DevOps automation platforms might offer a much better alternative. Let's compare these two approaches to identify the best option in terms of simplicity, developer experience (DX), time efficiency, operational and financial costs, and support.
Morgan Perry
Co-founder
Summary
Twitter icon
linkedin icon

Comparing Traditional Managed Services and DevOps Automation Platforms

To choose the right approach for managing infrastructure, it's essential to evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of traditional managed services and modern DevOps automation platforms. Each comes with distinct benefits and trade-offs that impact cost, scalability, flexibility, and developer experience. Let’s dive into the details.

Traditional Managed Services

Strengths:

  • Hands-Off Management: MSPs handle everything, allowing you to focus on your core business.
  • Expertise: Access to specialists in infrastructure, compliance, and security.
  • Stability: Reliable for businesses with low operational complexity and minimal change requirements.

Weaknesses:

  • High Costs: MSPs charge premium fees through hourly rates or long-term contracts.
  • Slow Changes: Dependency on external providers delays updates, troubleshooting, and feature rollouts.
  • Limited Agility: Iterative development cycles are constrained by external approval processes.
  • Reduced Control: Outsourcing infrastructure management reduces visibility and flexibility.
  • Suboptimal DX: Developers may find themselves dependent on third parties for essential tasks, slowing productivity.

DevOps Automation Platforms

Strengths:

  • Cost Efficiency: Reduces reliance on costly external consultants and prevents overprovisioning.
  • Faster Day 1 Operations: Tools like one-click deployments and infrastructure-as-code (IaC) cut setup time from weeks to hours.
  • Automated Day 2 Management: Built-in automation handles scaling, monitoring, compliance, and updates with minimal intervention.
  • Developer Autonomy: Intuitive interfaces let teams manage infrastructure without needing dedicated DevOps engineers.
  • Seamless Integration: DevOps Automation platforms integrate directly with AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud.
  • Rapid Iteration: Self-service features support continuous delivery and shorter development cycles.
  • Enhanced DX: Developers have direct control over deployments, improving efficiency and satisfaction.

Weaknesses:

  • Less Immediate Human Support: While these platforms offer robust automation, support is not always available 24/7 for complex or unique issues. This can require some scheduling flexibility for human assistance.

Head-to-Head Comparison

Let’s have a head-to-head comparison between traditional managed services and DevOps Automation platforms

head-to-head comparison between traditional managed services and DevOps Automation platforms

ROI and Cost Effectiveness Analysis

Direct Costs:

  • Traditional MSPs: Expensive contracts and retainers add up quickly.
  • DevOps Automation Platforms: Subscription-based models eliminate overprovisioning and optimize resource use.

Indirect Costs:

  1. Labor: MSPs require dedicated DevOps teams; automation reduces this need.
  2. Time: DevOps Automation Platforms reduce deployment cycles from weeks to hours.
  3. Opportunity: Faster infrastructure setup enables quicker product rollouts and innovation.

How DevOps Automation Platforms Boost ROI

DevOps automation platforms deliver impactful outcomes:

  • Slash Infrastructure Costs: Automate scaling and eliminate overprovisioning to cut infrastructure expenses by up to 50%.
  • Accelerate Time-to-Market: Rapid environment provisioning and one-click deployments reduce launch timelines from weeks to hours, enabling faster delivery and iteration cycles
  • Remove DevOps Hiring: Automation eliminates the need for specialized DevOps hires, saving hundreds of thousands in annual salaries and reducing recruitment bottlenecks..
  • Maximize Developer Output: User-friendly interfaces free developers from infrastructure maintenance, enabling them to focus on product delivery.
  • Unlock Scalability: Dynamically adjust resources to meet demand, ensuring performance during growth and peak loads.

Key Considerations for Choosing the Right Approach

Choosing the best infrastructure management approach depends on various factors. Below, we’ll break down the key considerations by segment and scenario to help you make the right decision.

1. Speed and Agility Needs

  • When to Choose Traditional Managed Services: If timelines are not critical and external expertise can handle complex setup over time, MSPs may work. However, expect longer lead times for deployments and updates.
  • When to Choose DevOps Automation Platforms: For teams needing rapid iterations, such as launching MVPs or scaling new features, automation platforms offer unmatched velocity. With one-click deployments and automated scaling, environments can be ready in minutes.

2. Budget and Cost Efficiency

  • Traditional Managed Services: Ideal for companies with fixed budgets willing to pay premium fees for outsourced expertise. However, costs can escalate with hourly rates and retainer fees.
  • DevOps Automation Platforms: Subscription-based pricing models and automated resource management reduce operational costs, making them suitable for startups or SMBs operating on tighter budgets.

3. Industry Regulations and Compliance

  • Traditional Managed Services: Best suited for industries with heavy compliance demands (e.g., healthcare, finance) requiring bespoke configurations and hands-on support. MSPs can offer guidance on regulatory frameworks like GDPR or HIPAA.
  • DevOps Platforms: Modern platforms like Qovery include built-in compliance tools for security and regulatory requirements. This approach is ideal for companies leveraging containerized apps in regulated environments.

4. Legacy Systems and Customization

  • Traditional Managed Services: The right choice for organizations with large, custom legacy infrastructures that require extensive, manual configurations and hands-on management.
  • DevOps Automation Platforms: Better suited for cloud-native architectures or containerized applications where integration and automation are key priorities. Platforms streamline operations while maintaining flexibility for modern workloads.

5. Long-Term Scalability

  • Traditional Managed Services: Scaling through MSPs can be time-consuming and costly, with additional fees for changes and resource provisioning.
  • DevOps Automation Platforms: Built-in auto-scaling and self-healing capabilities ensure seamless scalability as your business grows, without the need for external intervention.

6. Developer Experience

  • Traditional Managed Services: Teams relying on MSPs often experience slower feedback loops and limited control over deployments.
  • DevOps utomation Platforms: Developer-first features, such as environment cloning, Git-based workflows, and self-service options, empower teams to manage their infrastructure directly, boosting productivity and satisfaction

Why Qovery Stands Out

Qovery redefines infrastructure management by offering an end-to-end DevOps automation platform focused on developer experience and operational efficiency. It eliminates the need for dedicated DevOps recruitment by automating complex tasks like scaling, monitoring, and compliance. With a developer-first approach, seamless cloud integration, and built-in tools, Qovery empowers teams to deploy and manage applications faster, more reliably, and at lower costs compared to traditional managed services.

Key Features and Benefits

  • Production-Ready Infrastructure: Deploy complete, production-ready environments in minutes, compared to the days or weeks traditional methods require.
  • One-Click Deployments: Simplify and speed up deployment processes, enabling rapid iteration and faster go-to-market.
  • Built-In Automation: Automates critical tasks like auto-scaling, self-healing, and monitoring, ensuring optimal performance with minimal effort.
  • Seamless Cloud Integration: Works natively with AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud to leverage existing infrastructure without lock-in.
  • User-Friendly Interfaces: Qovery provides multiple interfaces—a user-friendly UI, a powerful API, a CLI, and a Terraform provider—to cater to different preferences and workflows.
  • Cost Optimization: Pay-as-you-go pricing ensures efficient resource usage, reducing operational costs.
  • Compliance and Security: Includes tools to meet regulatory standards (e.g., GDPR, SOC 2) and follow best practices.

Customer Success Stories

Qovery transforms infrastructure management for startups, SMBs, and enterprises by combining speed, simplicity, and cost efficiency.

Ready to experience the future of DevOps? Try Qovery today.

Share on :
Twitter icon
linkedin icon
Tired of fighting your Kubernetes platform?
Qovery provides a unified Kubernetes control plane for cluster provisioning, security, and deployments - giving you an enterprise-grade platform without the DIY overhead.
See it in action

Suggested articles

Kubernetes
DevOps
6
 minutes
Top Nutanix Alternatives for Kubernetes Management

Looking for alternatives to Nutanix Kubernetes Platform (NKP)? Compare the top 10 solutions. Review pros and cons to find tools that offer greater flexibility and lower costs.

Mélanie Dallé
Senior Marketing Manager
Kubernetes
DevOps
6
 minutes
Top Mirantis Alternatives That Developers Actually Love

Explore the top 10 alternatives to Mirantis. Compare pros and cons of modern Kubernetes platforms like Qovery, Rancher, and OpenShift to find your best fit.

Mélanie Dallé
Senior Marketing Manager
Kubernetes
DevOps
6
 minutes
Top 10 enterprise Kubernetes cluster management tools in 2026

Compare the best enterprise Kubernetes management tools for 2026. From Qovery and OpenShift to Rafay and Mirantis, discover which platform best suits your multi-cluster strategy.

Mélanie Dallé
Senior Marketing Manager
Kubernetes
DevOps
 minutes
Atmosly Alternatives: The Best Tools for Scaling Teams

Hit the ceiling with Atmosly? Discover the top 10 Kubernetes management alternatives for 2026. From Qovery’s developer-centric platform to Rancher’s operations control, find the right tool to scale your infrastructure.

Mélanie Dallé
Senior Marketing Manager
DevOps
 minutes
10 Best Octopus Deploy Alternatives: Trade Manual Deployment for Full Pipeline Automation

Modernize your pipeline. Explore the top Octopus Deploy alternatives for cloud-native Kubernetes delivery and full GitOps integration.

Mélanie Dallé
Senior Marketing Manager
DevOps
Platform Engineering
Kubernetes
5
 minutes
10 Best Container Management Tools for the Kubernetes Era

Move beyond basic Docker commands. We review the top container management platforms, including Qovery, Rancher, and OpenShift, that tame Kubernetes complexity and streamline your deployment workflows.

Morgan Perry
Co-founder
DevOps
16
 minutes
Enterprise DevOps Automation: Moving from Scripts to Platform Engineering

Stop writing fragile scripts. Discover how top enterprises use Kubernetes Management Platforms to automate governance (Policy-as-Code), scale ephemeral environments, and enforce FinOps with Spot Instances.

Mélanie Dallé
Senior Marketing Manager
DevOps
Kubernetes
 minutes
Top 10 Platform9 Alternatives: Best managed Kubernetes solutions for scale

Need a better way to manage on-prem Kubernetes? Review 10 alternatives to Platform9, categorized by "Infrastructure Ops" (Rancher) vs. "Developer Experience" (Qovery).

Mélanie Dallé
Senior Marketing Manager

It’s time to change
the way you manage K8s

Turn Kubernetes into your strategic advantage with Qovery, automating the heavy lifting while you stay in control.