Kubernetes Cluster Autoscaler vs Karpenter
Update: Qovery officially supports Karpenter for all Managed AWS EKS clusters
Cluster Autoscaler is a tool that automatically adjusts the size of the Kubernetes cluster when one of the following conditions is true:
- some pods failed to run in the cluster due to insufficient resources.
- there are nodes in the cluster that have been underutilized for an extended period of time, and their pods can be placed on other existing nodes.
Depending on the cloud provider, it’s built-in or not (eg. GCP provides it by default, and AWS not).
The Kubernetes autoscaling SIG has done excellent work since then, but having also worked with Mesos, I was waiting for an initiative to optimize pod placement and reduce the billing cost to the maximum. This is where Karpenter entered the game, launched by AWS.
Welcome Karpenter
Karpenter automatically launches just the right compute resources to handle your cluster's applications. It is designed to let you take full advantage of the cloud with fast and simple compute provisioning for Kubernetes clusters.
Karpenter vs Cluster Autoscaler
Karpenter can look like a simple alternative to Cluster autoscaler, but it’s more than that. Both are really good, but before choosing one, you have to know their strengths and weaknesses. Karpenter is more useful when you start to have a significant workload, while cluster autoscaler is not the best in this case.
I’ve tried to summarize both solutions:
Conclusion
Both Cluster Autoscaler and Karpenter are interesting solutions. Cluster autoscaler is more stable, and more used, while Karpenter is the outsider. If you want to use Karpenter, you have to be sure the workload is adapted to it, otherwise, Karpenter won’t be able to do its job properly and you won’t get its benefits.
At Qovery we’re considering Karpenter as an alternative for a cost-effective solution. Nowadays, we strongly think Cluster Autoscaler may be more adapted to production usage (because of the common usage where application cache is useful), and Karpenter for pre-prod/staging/testing usage. We also hope other cloud providers will invest in Karpenter and see it becoming the new standard.
.svg)
.svg)
.svg)
Suggested articles
Build Your Own PaaS: Stop depending on fixed cloud offerings. Discover the top 8 tools, including Qovery, Dokku, and Cloud Foundry, that let you build a customizable, low-maintenance PaaS on your cloud infrastructure.
Simplify Kubernetes Deployment. Learn the difficult 6-step manual process for deploying Docker containers to Kubernetes, the friction of YAML and kubectl, and how platform tools like Qovery automate the entire workflow.
Observability in DevOps: Diagnose system failures faster. Learn how true observability differs from traditional monitoring. End context-switching, reduce MTTR, and resolve unforeseen issues quickly.
Integrate security seamlessly into your CI/CD pipeline. Learn the 6 best DevSecOps practices—from Policy as Code to continuous monitoring—and see how Qovery automates compliance and protection without slowing development.
Fed up of rising Heroku costs and frequent outages? This guide compares the top 10 Heroku alternatives and competitors based on features, pricing, pros, and cons—helping developers and tech leaders choose the right PaaS.
Provisioning cloud resources shouldn’t require a second stack of tools. With Qovery’s new Terraform and OpenTofu support, you can now define and deploy your infrastructure right alongside your applications. Declaratively, securely, and in one place. No external runners. No glue code. No tool sprawl.
Looking for a Flux CD alternative? Discover why Qovery stands out as the #1 choice. Compare features, pros, and cons of the top 10 platforms to simplify your deployment strategy and empower your team.
.webp)