Bug Hunting and improvements week - what we improve on Qovery
Why did we use a full sprint for bug hunting?
While it is true that we fix bugs in every sprint (20% maximum of each sprint is dedicated to bug fixes), sometimes it is not enough to fix them all, and as you can imagine, itâs not good practice to let them live in the backlog forever. A lot of companies, such as Dashlane or MyPorsche, are working with a âZero bug policyâ, and at Qovery, we have our way to make sure that bugs are taken care of:
- In a standard sprint, we can use up to 20% of each sprint for bugs
- If our backlog is greater than 20% of bugs, we freeze the next sprint to make it a âbug only sprint.â
The reason behind that is the same as for the âZero bug policyâ if you leave bugs live in your backlog, there is a chance that they will never be fixed, and there is nothing worst for a user than seeing the same bug. Over and over!
What are the improvements?
Frontend
- (feat) filter logs by pod name
- (fix) avoid having the same colour for different pods
- (fix) refresh application metrics when switching between apps and during deployment
the next step is to add the instance type selection instead of the CPU/RAM during the cluster setup
Backend
- (fix) Special characters in database credentials can lead to unexpected behaviour (if you were using Postgres and Redis, the special characters were not well supported, and it was causing issues for the passwords that had some inside)
- (feat) [CLI] Allow using an URL to connect via the qovery shell command
- (feat) Display in logs if the Docker cache is used correctly
- (feat) Accept instance type selection in cluster setup + provide an endpoint to list available instance types
- (fix) Desired nodes should be higher or equal to min node
- (fix) Canât switch database from private to public and vice versa (container side)
- (fix) Stopping containerized databases means losing data
- (fix) âDelete organizationâ API call not working when there are no clusters
Wrapping up
While itâs true that we are putting a lot of work and effort to build our V3, we also want to make sure that we keep the V2 as stable and user friendly as possible and make changes like improving the application build-time or avoiding having the same colour for different pods may seem minor. Still, all added up; we believe that it will significantly enhance your product use.
.svg)
.svg)
.svg)
Suggested articles
Build Your Own PaaS: Stop depending on fixed cloud offerings. Discover the top 8 tools, including Qovery, Dokku, and Cloud Foundry, that let you build a customizable, low-maintenance PaaS on your cloud infrastructure.
Simplify Kubernetes Deployment. Learn the difficult 6-step manual process for deploying Docker containers to Kubernetes, the friction of YAML and kubectl, and how platform tools like Qovery automate the entire workflow.
Observability in DevOps: Diagnose system failures faster. Learn how true observability differs from traditional monitoring. End context-switching, reduce MTTR, and resolve unforeseen issues quickly.
Integrate security seamlessly into your CI/CD pipeline. Learn the 6 best DevSecOps practicesâfrom Policy as Code to continuous monitoringâand see how Qovery automates compliance and protection without slowing development.
Fed up of rising Heroku costs and frequent outages? This guide compares the top 10 Heroku alternatives and competitors based on features, pricing, pros, and consâhelping developers and tech leaders choose the right PaaS.
Provisioning cloud resources shouldnât require a second stack of tools. With Qoveryâs new Terraform and OpenTofu support, you can now define and deploy your infrastructure right alongside your applications. Declaratively, securely, and in one place. No external runners. No glue code. No tool sprawl.
Looking for a Flux CD alternative? Discover why Qovery stands out as the #1 choice. Compare features, pros, and cons of the top 10 platforms to simplify your deployment strategy and empower your team.
.webp)